After reading the documents from the Dylann Roof case, do you think he should have been found competent to stand trial ad allowed to represent himself at trial? Why or why not? (Your discussion should focus on substantive mental health law issues not your subjective personal opinions). Use the sources below:Melton Ch 6 Competence to Proceed Sack, K. (2017, Feb. 2).Trial Documents Show Dylann Roof Had Mental Disorders.ActionsNew York Times. Letter from Dylann Roof to prosecutionActions, November 2016 Judge R.M. Gergel (2017, Jan 18).Judicial opinion finding Dylann Roof competent to stand trial and represent himself again after a second competency hearing.Actions Sack, K. (2017, May 31).Court Files Raise Question: Was Dylann Roof Competent to Defend Himself?ActionsNew York Times. Pages 1-3 and 51-56 ofDr. Loftins Dec. 2016 psychological evaluation of Dylann RoofActions(skim the rest) (Skim) Tullis, P. (2019, Dec 9).When Metal Illness Becomes a Jail SentenceActions.The Atlantic. (Read title
The post After reading the documents from the Dylann Roof case, do you think he should appeared first on .