What are the differences and similarities between transformational, transactional, situational and humanistic leadership?

Read the following articles from the Harvard course pack:https://hbsp.harvard.edu/import/834050
1. When Should a Leader Be Directive or Empowering? How to Develop Your Own Situational Theory of Leadership, by Henry P. Sims Jr., Samer Faraj, Seokhwa Yun2. It’s How You Frame it: Transformational Leadership and the Meaning of Work,by Timothy P. Munyon, Dean J. Cleavenger3. Discovering Your Authentic Leadership, by William W. George, Peter Sims, Andrew N. McLean, David Mayer, Diana Mayer4. Providing Guidelines for Leader Reward and Punishment Behavior, byNathan P. Podsakoff, Philip M. Podsakoff, Valentina Kuskova5. What makes a leader? By Daniel GolemanFrom the Web, read these articles below:6. The Humanistic Leadership Model – Craig Nathanson7. https://drcraignathanson.com/?s=the+humanistic+leadership+model9. https://drcraignathanson.com/humanistic-leadership-and-self-awareness/From your reading, what are the differences and similarities between transformational, transactional, situational and humanistic leadership?Which approach do you think will work best for the Gen Z and Millennium generations and why?Avoid using quotes from the articles. Explain the concepts in your own words and use proper citations and references. Use personal voice e.g. I agree, I feel, I believe, etc. and real-life examples from your experience. This paper should have at least 3 references.Suggested format requirements: Write 3-4 pages. Use Times New Roman, 12 font size, double space. Use references and in-text citations in APA format.Grading Rubric:Format: 10% of your grade. Paper should be well written and organized, uses clear English and logical development of argument. Proper APA style for citations and references was used.Content:18 points: Explained key concepts that you learned from the material using good practical examples and supported your ideas with relevant outside references. (3 references are required). Explained the implications of using different approaches to leadership and how it affects either the worker or the organization. Showed your critical thinking and used your personal voice.16 points: Explained key concepts using examples and supported your ideas with relevant outside references (3 references are required). However, critical thinking and development of argument need development in some areas.14 points: Paper was written according to the requirements but could be improved by using more examples or outside research. Writing needs development in critical thinking and writing.12 points: Paper did not follow most of the requirements. Did not demonstrate understanding of the question and key concepts from the suggested material.Under 12 pointsUnsatisfactory effort.