Write and submit a well-rounded and analytical analysis that should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion but also an explanation of the reason or your reasons for the choice.

Write and submit a well-rounded and analytical analysis that should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion but also an explanation of the reason or your reasons for the choice. Yourreasons are to incorporate your understanding and application of the coursematerial for full credit. Use the material from the lessons, text,videos, Professor presentations, and/or discussions. Your grade is basedon your understanding of the course material and ability to apply it to abusiness conduct related legal, political or ethical issue.Post your caseanalysis in the corresponding week’s assignment dropbox. The case assignmentsare posted below in the Case Assignments.The assignmentshould consist of a Word Document, 2 pages inlength double spaced, 12-point font, 1-inch margins not including title pageand reference page. (Short papers will lose significant points!!). Allcases will automatically be submitted to Turnitin. Your paper should follow thecase format (below) and include a summary of the relevant facts, the law,judicial opinion, etc.Research the case using the case citation inthe DeVry Library under databases (select – Hein Online), FindLaw.com, andother legal sources. Research the parties and circumstances of the case itself.USE the case format below.Your grade is basedon the content contained in the actualsubmission.Each assignment isworth 75 points. 25points for Part 1, 50 points for Part 2, as per the format provided below.
Case Analysis FormatRead and understandthe case or question assigned. Show your Analysis and Reasoning and make itclear you understand the material. Be sure to incorporate the concepts of thechapter we are studying to show your reasoning. Your analysis shouldfollow the following format:
PAGE ONE:Part I. THE CASE CITATION and BRIEFParties [Identify the plaintiff(s) and thedefendant(s)]Facts [Summarize only those facts critical tothe outcome of the case]Prior History of the Case[What was the outcomein the lower court(s)? Who brought the appeal?]Issue [Note the central question or questionson which the case turns. Try to find what the court states as theissue(s)]Explain the applicable law(s). Do some researchon the laws cited in the case. Be specificHolding [How did the court resolve theissue(s)? Who won?]Reasoning [Explain the logic that supported thecourt’s decision]
PAGE TWO:Part 2. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CASEA. Explain how this case adds to your knowledge of the law atissue and whether you agree or not with the decision. Give reasons based on legal, political and/orethical concepts covered in the course orfrom other relevant sources. (Be sure to cite other sources)B. Based on yourunderstanding of this case, or from research of relevant sources, what recommendation(s) does this case specify ought toor suggest that a corporate entity might institute to avoid legal liability.Reference that part of the case specifically stating the recommendation or thatpart of the case supporting your opinion of that suggestion.
Submit yourassignment as a Microsoft Word document.The case you are to brief and analyze for Week 4is: COOMER VKANSAS CITY ROYALS, Supreme Court of Missouri 437 S.W. 3d 184